Post by account_disabled on Nov 25, 2023 8:31:16 GMT
When I started this blog, I didn't always post good articles. Some time ago, reviewing the posts from the first three months of Blue Penna's life, I saved almost none of them. But I said it: in practice I developed the editorial plan only later. For some time, however, my mania for quality in content has made me be careful, very careful not to make certain mistakes from the past again. By publishing articles of no use – like the ones I have listed here – we are not offering anything to the reader nor can that content be useful to us. The double utility of posts When I write an article, for me it doesn't just mean giving something good to the public who follows me, who will gain from it by reflecting, learning, even doubting, but that post must guarantee me a return in terms of visits, positioning of the blog for my main words key, work contacts, but above all the possibility of writing other articles .
How many times have I said that I wrote articles thanks to the comments I read? One of the last comments received, on an old post, even gave Phone Number Data me the idea for a series of posts, which will now be released in 2015. Without that comment I would never have thought of it. But this is only possible by writing good content, excellent articles, indeed (for once allow me a little arrogance). Articles that push people to leave their opinion, preferably the opposite of ours, because in that way they will stimulate our creativity and our ancestral instinct to counter. And now let's move on to the five types of posts that I include among the contents not to create. 1 – News on software updates, events, etc.
When I talked about quality content , I gave a clear example of the classic news articles that are too often read in blogs: a Google algorithm update comes out and you read dozens of posts reporting it a WordPress update comes out and you read dozens of posts reporting it Whatever happens online produces an epidemic of creativity, but in the end there is nothing creative or even useful about it. One bed, all beds. News should push you to write an in-depth article, not limit yourself to the mere reporting of a skimpy opinion. News should stimulate creativity, not extinguish it. 2 – Award and various chain letters I say it clearly, at the risk of making myself dislike new and causing defections from the blog: I can't stand the awards that are given to blogs and bloggers. For me the biggest prize is gaining readers.
How many times have I said that I wrote articles thanks to the comments I read? One of the last comments received, on an old post, even gave Phone Number Data me the idea for a series of posts, which will now be released in 2015. Without that comment I would never have thought of it. But this is only possible by writing good content, excellent articles, indeed (for once allow me a little arrogance). Articles that push people to leave their opinion, preferably the opposite of ours, because in that way they will stimulate our creativity and our ancestral instinct to counter. And now let's move on to the five types of posts that I include among the contents not to create. 1 – News on software updates, events, etc.
When I talked about quality content , I gave a clear example of the classic news articles that are too often read in blogs: a Google algorithm update comes out and you read dozens of posts reporting it a WordPress update comes out and you read dozens of posts reporting it Whatever happens online produces an epidemic of creativity, but in the end there is nothing creative or even useful about it. One bed, all beds. News should push you to write an in-depth article, not limit yourself to the mere reporting of a skimpy opinion. News should stimulate creativity, not extinguish it. 2 – Award and various chain letters I say it clearly, at the risk of making myself dislike new and causing defections from the blog: I can't stand the awards that are given to blogs and bloggers. For me the biggest prize is gaining readers.